Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
October 12, 2010 Lasers and Reflections (Period 1)
e mirror at the same angle as the laser was shot. After doing 8 trials with the mirror and protactor we determined that when the laser is shot through the protractor it reflected off the mirror at the same angle that they were shot at. When shot at 10 degrees, the laser was reflected at 10 degrees. When the laser was shot at 20 degrees. it reflected at 20 degrees and so on. These experiments lead to the confirmation of our hypothesis that lasers reflect off of a mirror at the same angle as they were shot.(A picture of what I saw when I shot the laser through the protractor onto the mirror)
Later, Finley talked to us about a couple of things on our lab reports. Remember that there are no claculations necessary for today's lab. Then we talked about uncertainty, which is one half of the smallest increment, something else to think about for taday's lab report.
We walked out of class today with a proven hypothesis of lasers reflect off of a mirror at the same angle as they are shot and some things to consider for our lab reports tonight with uncertainty and no calculations.
KS
Monday, October 11, 2010
October 11, 2010 - Playing with Lasers and Mirrors [ Period 1 ]
People, though, were playing and being somewhat foolish with lasers and pointing them to the wall and ceiling. Now this may be off topic, but, when the laser hit the ceiling light, the light spread out. As in, the one point would show, but then a glow of light would with a clearer red (kind of like transparency, you could still see the ceiling light) than the one point. This only went for when the lights were turn off. Our subsitute said we should do at least three trials, which most groups did, and we gave a little time for the people who didn't do three trials. When we turned the lights on, people began to write up what they saw, and gave back all the lasers and mirrors.
Tables discussed their hypothesis together, which caused some heated discussions at some tables. Afterwards, we discussed as a whole class if the statement was true, that laser A and B were notequivilent. A couple of groups thought no, they are not equivilent. At the end, groups wrote up their conculsions in their own opinion, but help from their groups.
Fun fact: Did you know that the laser was invented in New Providence? I bet you didn't. Our morning substitute was just so awesome to let us on this fun fact.
CP
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Lasers and Mirrors -Period 1

We also discussed why different colors affect the laser. We cam to the conclusion that some colors absorb more light and some colors reflect more. But then we had an idea. What does the light look like on different surfaces? So we got a mirror to see what would happen with the laser on it. My group saw that you can see the light in the mirror but you could also see it on some other object just as clearly because the light is reflected off of the mirror. Conor also had a good idea. His idea was that i you point the laser at a 35 degree angle onto the mirror, it will reflect off at a 35 degree angle so that the two angle would be congruent. The Finley told us that even though our hypothesis worked with a flat mirror, will it work with a curved mirror? Finley had another question for us which was does the laser hit more that one point on the mirror? Yolanda had a good idea that if we hit the laser at any point on the curved mirror, that it would work just like a flat mirror and reflect the laser off at the same angle just like a flat mirror. We all eventually agreed on that and Finley also told us that the laser only hits one place on the mirror. After that Finley gave us a new vocabulary word, normal. He said that the normal is perpendicular to the line that the laser is reflecting off of. So our conclusion for the class was that light bounces off of a mirror at the same angle that you pointed the laser, no matter if the mirror is flat or curved.
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Period 1
Next we had the light and a piece of cardboard, there was a hole in the piece of cardboard. When the candle was shining there was a dot on the wall from the candle through the cardboard. The dot was the image of the candle uside down. We drew up how this happend with the rays from the light. Every table in the class had a different idea of how the candle was upside down when it went through the little hole through the cardboard. We said that the light from the bottom went through the hole and went to the top of the shadow on the wall.
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
Absorbing Lasers and Experiment Assumptions -Period 1
Then Mr. Finley told us that our experiment on Friday had gave data that he had never seen before. We then tried to figure out his assumption that he made.
We made three guesses:
- The size of the light bulb
- We all had the lights on at the same time
- The type of the light bulb


Friday, October 1, 2010
Period 1 - Light
During the class discussion, we talked about the results of our experiments. On the white board, Mr. Finley drew how the light fans out through the hole in the carboard. The main points of the discussion were that the the light on the wall is bigger than the hole in the cardboard. The other point that we discussed is that if there were no sides of the cardboard the light will go in all directions. The light will go all of the directions it can reach. Also, light on the wall as the surface gets farther away.
I found this link that explained the concept a little more: http://www.accessexcellence.org/AE/AEC/CC/vision_background.php
TR
